Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Smith et al v. Arizona Cardinals Football Club, LLC
as 4:2015cv01903
Plaintiff:
John Thomas J.T. Smith , Monica Smith , Edward Scott and others
Defendant:
Arizona Cardinals Football Club, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith et al
as 4:2015cv01902
Plaintiff:
John Thomas J.T. Smith, Monica Smith, Edward Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ekryss et al v. Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv06742
Plaintiff:
Jhared Ekryss, Connie Jean Juergens, Stephen Seigal and others
Defendant:
Ignite Restaurant Group, Inc., Raymond A. Blanchette, III, Kevin Cottingim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Jackson v. McKenzie Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv10185
Plaintiff:
Jade Jackson
Defendant:
McKenzie Enterprises, Inc. and Donald McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Caswell v. Pathways Center for Developmental and Behavioral Growth et al
as 3:2015cv00100
Plaintiff:
Justin Caswell
Defendant:
Pathways Center for Developmental and Behavioral Growth and Jade Benefield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Judd v. Access Midstream Partners LP
as 5:2014cv01429
Plaintiff:
Jade K Judd
Defendant:
Access Midstream Partners LP
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Khalil v. Smoke Cheap, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv02884
Plaintiff:
Yousef Khalil
Defendant:
Smoke Cheap, Inc., Monah Zahreddine, Yousef Malkeya and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cordova v. Jade Restoration Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv04662
Plaintiff:
Luis Cordova
Defendant:
Jade Restoration Corp. and John O'Reilly
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cordova v. Jade Restoration Corp. et al
as 2:2014cv04662
Plaintiff:
Luis Cordova
Defendant:
Jade Restoration Corp. and John O'Reilly
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hill v. Pethel et al
as 1:2014cv02248
Plaintiff:
Michele Hill
Defendant:
Jade Pethel and McVicker & Associates Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
