Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Michael Ward, et al v. Kroger Company, et al
as 08-56614
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL WARD, ROSE CARSON, CINDY KLINKENBEARD and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KROGER COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, DAVID HIRZ, JOHN BURGON and others
Thomas v. Kroger Company, The et al
as 1:2008cv00581
Plaintiff:
Mable Thomas
Defendant:
Kroger Company, The, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and John Doe Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Warehouse Production and Maint v. Zenith Logistics, Inc., et al
as 08-3267
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAREHOUSE PRODUCTION AND MAINTENANCE EMPLOYEES AND FURNITURE PIANO EXPRESS DRIVERS AND HELPERS LOCAL 661, affiliated with the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Defendant - Appellee:
ZENITH LOGISTICS, INC., THE KROGER COMPANY and KROGER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP I
Carol Bryant et al v. New Albertson's Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv01046
Plaintiff:
Carol Bryant, Carol Bryant, Carol Bryant and others
Defendant:
New Albertson's Inc., New Albertson's Inc., Ralphs Grocery Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Petkus v. Kroger Company
as 2:2007cv15502
Plaintiff:
Joseph J Petkus
Defendant:
Kroger Company and Kroger Company
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Kroger Company v. United Food & Commercial Worke
as 07-2228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KROGER COMPANY
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS UNION, LOCAL 876
King v. Kroger Company
as 3:2007cv01340
Plaintiff:
Gloria King
Defendant:
Kroger Company and Kroger Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Michael Ward et al v. Ralphs Grocery Company et al
as 2:2007cv01085
Plaintiff:
Michael Ward, Michael Ward, Michael Ward and others
Defendant:
Ralphs Grocery Company, Ralphs Grocery Company, Ralphs Grocery Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
