Cases 41 - 47 of 47
ACS Recovery Services, Inc. v. Marshall
as 1:2007cv07362
Plaintiff:
ACS Recovery Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Michelle Marshall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Bloomfield v. Macshane et al
as 1:2007cv03934
Petitioner:
Marshall E. Bloomfield
Respondent:
Dermot Macshane, Sergeant's Benevolent Association Annuity Fund, The City of New York Police Pension Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Lilly v. Oneida Ltd. Employee Benefits Administrative Committee et al
as 6:2007cv00340
Plaintiff:
Milton Lilly, Milton Lilly, Milton Lilly and others
Defendant:
Oneida Ltd. Employee Benefits Administrative Committee, Oneida Ltd. Management Development and Executive Compensation Committee, Oneida Ltd. Pension and Profit Sharing Fund Investment Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
In Re: Novartis Wage and Hour Litigation
as 1:2006md01794
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Toan, Kaila Jo Kirbach, Jonathan Gilman Sanders and others
Defendant:
Novartis Corporation, Novartis Finance Corporation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sherrill et al v. Sutherland Global Services, Inc. et al
as 6:2005cv06537
Plaintiff:
Margarita Sherrill, Tony Falso, Jon Stewart and others
Defendant:
Sutherland Global Services, Inc. and The Sutherland Group, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Robinson, et al v. Eastman Kodak
as 6:2002cv06204
Plaintiff:
Lawrence T Heinsler, Stephen M. Ellis, Thomas L. Braden and others
Special Master:
Esq. Steven V Modica
Defendant:
Eastman Kodak Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Levinson, et al v. Primedia, Inc., et al
as 1:2002cv02222
Plaintiff:
Deborah Levinson , Theresa Jansen , Jana M. Jones and others
Defendant:
Primedia, Inc. , About.com, Inc. , Scott Kurnit and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
