Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Polo v. 5 Brothers Restuarant, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv03585
Plaintiff:
Victor Polo
Defendant:
5 Brothers Restuarant, Inc., Nino D'onofrio and Anthony D'Onofrio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Parikh v. Marco Polo Networks, Inc.
as 1:2009cv03348
Plaintiff:
Ankit Parikh
Defendant:
Marco Polo Networks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mendez v. Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation
as 1:2009cv06482
Plaintiff:
Janet Mendez
Defendant:
Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mazzarella-Eltanikhy v. Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation Disability Income Insurance Plan et al
as 1:2009cv02998
Plaintiff:
Anna Mazzarella-Eltanikhy
Defendant:
Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation Disability Income Insurance Plan and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Finkel v. Polo Electric Corp.
as 1:2009cv02827
Plaintiff:
Frank Finkel
Defendant:
Polo Electric Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Zegarra v. Marco Polo, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00891
Plaintiff:
Vivian G. Zegarra
Defendant:
Marco Polo, Inc., Marco Polo Caterers, Inc. and Alfredo Pestana
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sanz
as 9:2007cv80725
Plaintiff:
Jorge Sanz and Jorge Sanz
Defendant:
Mosquito Mound Polo, Inc. and Angenita Grande
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Otsuka et al v. Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv02780
Plaintiff:
Ann Otsuka, Ann Otsuka, Janis Keefe and others
Defendant:
Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation, Polo Ralph Lauren Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Jimenez v. Polo Construction, Inc.
as 9:2007cv80236
Plaintiff:
Gelasio Jimenez
Defendant:
Polo Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
