Cases 61 - 70 of 136
Unite Here Local 49 v. Khan
as 2:2013cv01985
Plaintiff:
Unite Here Local 49
Defendant:
Dam Khan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Unite Here Local 49 v. Khan
as 2:2013at01099
Plaintiff:
Unite Here Local 49
Defendant:
Dam Khan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
UNITE HERE LOCAL 54 v. BALLY'S PARK PLACE, INC.
as 1:2013cv04441
Plaintiff:
UNITE HERE LOCAL 54
Defendant:
BALLY'S PARK PLACE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
BANQUET SERVERS HYATT REGENCY PENNS LANDING v. UNITE HERE LOCAL 274 et al
as 2:2013cv03855
Plaintiff:
BANQUET SERVERS HYATT REGENCY PENNS LANDING
Defendant:
UNITE HERE LOCAL 274 and HYATT REGENCY HOTEL PENNS LANDING RESTURANT/ KEATINGS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
UNITE HERE LOCAL 274 BANQUET SERVERS A LIST v. SHERATON UNIVERSITY CITY/MS EMPLOYMENT et al
as 2:2013cv03787
Plaintiff:
UNITE HERE LOCAL 274 BANQUET SERVERS A LIST and JOSEPH DIGENOVA
Defendant:
SHERATON UNIVERSITY CITY/MS EMPLOYMENT, STADIUM HOLIDAY INN, MARGE MCBRIDE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Volume Services, Inc. v. Unite Here, Local 2
as 4:2013cv02318
Plaintiff:
Volume Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Unite Here, Local 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Unite Here Local 49 v. Khan
as 2:2012cv02415
Plaintiff:
Unite Here Local 49
Defendant:
Dam Khan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Unite Here Local 49 v. Khan
as 2:2012at01282
Petitioner:
Unite Here Local 49
Respondent:
Dam Khan
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Unite Here Local 355 v. Hollywood Greyhound Track, Inc. et al
as 0:2012cv61135
Plaintiff:
Unite Here Local 355
Defendant:
Hollywood Greyhound Track, Inc., Hartman & Tyner, Inc. and Hollywood Concessions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 01851
KPODI v. CENTERPLATE et al
as 2:2012cv02473
Plaintiff:
NYEPLU KPODI
Defendant:
CENTERPLATE and UNITE HERE LOCAL 100
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
