Cases 71 - 77 of 77
Doris Miller v. The Regis Corporation, et al
as 08-56088
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DORIS MILLER, on behalf of herself, the general public and as an "aggrieved employees" under the California Labor Code Private Attorney General Act.
Defendant - Appellee:
THE REGIS CORPORATION and SUPERCUTS CORPORATE STORES INC., Erroneously Sued as Supercuts Corporate Shops Inc.
NH Attorney General v. Customized Structures, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00415
Plaintiff:
NH Attorney General
Defendant:
Customized Structures, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Hilsenrath, et al v. Swiss Confederation, et al
as 07-17127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HANA HILSENRATH and OLIVER HILSENRATH
Plaintiff:
NANA HILSENRAH, LIOR HILSENRATH, ELLA HOPE HILSENRATH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THE SWISS CONFEDERATION, FEDERAL ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SWITZERLAND, GERARD SAUTEBIN and others
Willcox v. Tennessee District Attorneys General Conference et al
as 3:2007cv00359
Plaintiff:
Edith S Willcox
Defendant:
Tennessee District Attorneys General Conference, James W Kirby and Russell Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
SPELLMAN v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE et al
as 2:2007cv00067
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY SPELLMAN
Defendant:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Amicu:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF MAINE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
United Prescription Services, Inc. v. Attorney General of the United States, et al
as 8:2007cv00316
Plaintiff:
United Prescription Services, Inc. and United Prescription Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States and Karen Tandy
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
Nigg, et al v. USPS
as 05-55650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT NIGG and KEITH LEWIS, as private attorney generals and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
GINA HARRELL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
