Cases 1 - 10 of 5,907
McCain et al v. Accuwatt's Contracting Service, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Michael McCain, James D. Hornsby and Southern Electrical Retirement Fund
Defendant:
Accuwatt's Contracting Service, LLC and Denver Miller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Norwood v. Mulberry Medical Aesthetics, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Norwood
Defendant:
Mulberry Medical Aesthetics, LLC and Theron Hutton, MD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Clark v. Reda et al
as 3:2024cv00707
Plaintiff:
Lauren Clark
Defendant:
Rick Reda and Reda Home Builders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hardaway v. Wingmann, LLC
as 2:2024cv02388
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Hardaway
Defendant:
Wingmann, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gilliland v. Keystone Multisite Solutions LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jordan Gilliland
Defendant:
Keystone Multisite Solutions LLC and Melissa Key
McCain et al v. Energy Mat Alliance, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Michael McCain, James D. Hornsby and Southern Electrical Retirement Fund
Defendant:
Energy Mat Alliance, LLC and Steven Rooker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
McCroskey v. The Robinette Company
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Gary McCroskey
Defendant:
The Robinette Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
v. The Robinette Company
as 2:2024cv00095
Defendant:
The Robinette Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
McCroskey v. The Robinette Company
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Gary McCroskey
Defendant:
The Robinette Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Hast v. Wild Hawk Wild Life LLC et al
as 2:2024cv02368
Plaintiff:
Daniel T. Hast
Defendant:
Wild Hawk Wild Life LLC and Derrick Times
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
