Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MARK MCCLESKEY, et al v. HOOKS AV, LLC
as 1:2018cv02397
Plaintiff:
MARK MCCLESKEY and INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS
Defendant:
HOOKS AV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
MARK MCCLESKEY, TRUSTEE et al v. HOOKS AV, LLC
as 1:2017cv04140
Defendant:
HOOKS AV, LLC
Plaintiff:
INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS and MARK MCCLESKEY, TRUSTEE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
HOOK v. MADISON PRECISION PRODUCTS, INC.
as 4:2014cv00122
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D. HOOK, II
Defendant:
MADISON PRECISION PRODUCTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
BALLARD et al v. FLYING HOOK CRANE SERVICE et al
as 1:2011cv00428
Plaintiff:
JOHN BALLARD and MID CENTRAL OPERATING ENGINEERS HEALTH & WELFARE FUND
Defendant:
EQUIPMENT RENTAL, INC. and FLYING HOOK CRANE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Kasmark et al v. DV Technologies Inc
as 2:2009cv00409
Plaintiff:
Raymond E Kasmark, Patrick G Bailey, Dennis K Showers and others
Defendant:
DV Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Kasmark et al v. Kelly
as 2:2009cv00191
Plaintiff:
Raymond E Kasmark, Patrick G Bailey, Dennis K Showers and others
Defendant:
Tim Kelly
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Kasmark et al v. Grays Electrical Service LLC
as 2:2009cv00172
Plaintiff:
Raymond E Kasmark, Patrick G Bailey, Dennis K Showers and others
Defendant:
Grays Electrical Service LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
CARIE et al v. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.
as 1:2009cv00524
Plaintiff:
STACY M. CARIE, STACY M. CARIE, LE C. HOOK and others
Defendant:
SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
