Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Amos et al v. NAPA Management Services Corporation
as 7:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Barry D Amos, Luis Arce, Andrew Barton and others
Defendant:
NAPA Management Services Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Avery et al v. RHA Health Services, LLC
as 1:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Monica Avery, Amy Paleno and Tyler Mudd
Defendant:
RHA Health Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gibson v. Principle Long Term Care, Inc. et al
as 7:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Walter Gibson
Defendant:
Principle Long Term Care, Inc., Holly Hall, Amy Fulwiler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Holsclaw v. Corriher Tractor, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00075
Plaintiff:
Amy C. Holsclaw
Defendant:
Corriher Tractor, Inc. and Charles R. Corriher, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hutcherson v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
as 4:2019cv00077
Defendant:
Ahrens-Naef Consulting Company, Aetna Life Insurance Company, Butler Capital Advisors, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Paula Hutcherson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Meyers et al v. Catamount Marketing Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00551
Defendant:
Christopher Landis, Karen Landis, Concelium, LLC, d/b/a Liberty Tax and others
Plaintiff:
Ernestine Washington, Patricia Roberts and Dammione Meyers
v. Hartness et al
as 3:2018cv00510
Defendant:
Amy O'Brien Hartness and ABT, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Hartness v. ABT, Inc.
as 5:2018cv00150
Defendant:
ABT, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Amy O'Brien Hartness
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Morgan et al v. The Charlotte Mecklenburg Hospital Authority et al
as 3:2017cv00540
Plaintiff:
Amy Morgan , Terri Smith and Erin Harris
Defendant:
The Charlotte Mecklenburg Hospital Authority and Carolinas Healthcare System
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203
HEATH v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 1:2017cv00225
Plaintiff:
AMY T. HEATH
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
