Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bolar et al v. Southern Intermodal Xpress, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00360
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bolar , William Clifton , Bryan Freeman and others
Defendant:
Southern Intermodal Xpress, LLC, Lazer Spot, Inc. and Lazer Spot Holdings Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Cooley et al v. HMR of Alabama, Inc.
as 4:2016cv01432
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Cooley , Heather Adams , Rosie Boyd and others
Defendant:
HMR of Alabama, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Adams, et al. v. Ambassador Personnel, Inc., et al. (JOINT ASSIGN)
as 2:2014cv00900
Plaintiff:
Anthony Adams , Billy Andrews , Quincy Armstrong and others
Defendant:
Ambassador Personnel, Inc. , Ambassador Personnel of Alabama, Inc. and Guyoung Tech USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Worley v. Calhoun County Commission
as 1:2013cv01887
Plaintiff:
Dennis Worley
Defendant:
Calhoun County Commission
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Calhoun v. TRI Staffing, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01224
Defendant:
Elwood TRI, Inc. and Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
Plaintiff:
Leonard Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Calhoun v. TRI Staffing, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01225
Defendant:
Elwood TRI, Inc. and Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
Plaintiff:
Tamela Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Calhoun v. TRI Staffing, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01226
Defendant:
Elwood TRI, Inc. and Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
Plaintiff:
Thomas Calhoun, III
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Akings et al v. Wayne Farms, LLC
as 2:2007cv00297
Plaintiff:
Amos Akings, Amos Akings, Mary Ann Allums and others
Defendant:
Wayne Farms, LLC and Wayne Farms, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Allen, et al v. Reynolds, et al
as 1:1996cv01423
Plaintiff:
Mary Nixon, Vergena Richardson, Annie C Brockman and others
Defendant:
Johnny Heard, Jack Wood, Robert Rigsby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
