Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Corrina Martin v. CB Restaurants, Inc., et al
as 5:2020cv01334
Counter Plaintiff:
Teresa Thompson, Glenn Williams, CB Restaurants, Inc. d/b/a Sugar's Gentlemen's Club and others
Plaintiff:
Corrina Martin, Brenda Tagle and Briana Bass
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Glickler v. CB Cafes Main, LLC
as 4:2020cv00827
Defendant:
CB Cafes Main, LLC
Plaintiff:
Daniel Glickler
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Padilla v. CB Restaurants, Inc.
as 5:2019cv00970
Counter Plaintiff:
Teresa Thompson and CB Restaurants, Inc. d/b/a Sugar's Gentlemen's Club
Defendant:
Glenn Williams and CB Restaurants, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sarah Padilla
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stout v. CBS Corporation
as 4:2019cv00317
Defendant:
CBS Corporation
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Stout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Terry v. CB&I et al
as 4:2017cv00367
Defendant:
CB&I, CB&I Inc. and Stone & Webster Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey W Terry
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Nguyen v. Life Insurance Company of North America Administrator of the CB&I Human Resources benefits Long Term Disability Plan
as 4:2011cv03032
Plaintiff:
Xa Nguyen
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America Administrator of the CB&I Human Resources benefits Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Krantz v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01234
Plaintiff:
Carol Wayne Krantz
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. , CB Richard Ellis Group, Inc. , CB Richard Ellis, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Heard v. CBS Mechanical Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00212
Plaintiff:
John Heard
Defendant:
CBS Mechanical Services, Inc. and Perry Sanford
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Zak v. CBS Combined Pension Plan et al
as 1:2007cv00958
Plaintiff:
Thomas S. Zak
Defendant:
CBS Combined Pension Plan, CBS Combined Pension Plan Plan Administrator, CitiStreet LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
