Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Beal v. Chicago Transit Authority et al
as 1:2023cv01387
Plaintiff:
Ernest Beal
Defendant:
Chicago Transit Authority and Kanitha Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Byrd et al v. Chicago Transit Authority
as 1:2020cv03613
Plaintiff:
Michael Keele, Louis J Gordon, Joseph J Wright and others
Defendant:
Chicago Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Taylor v. The Chicago Transit Authority
as 1:2018cv07359
Defendant:
The Chicago Transit Authority
Plaintiff:
Keith Taylor
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Michelin Retirement Plan, The et al v. Dilworth Paxson LLP et al
as 6:2016cv03604
Plaintiff:
Michelin Retirement Plan, The and Investment Committee of the Michelin Retirement Plan, The
Defendant:
Dilworth Paxson LLP, Thorsdale Fiduciary and Guaranty Company Ltd, Michelle A Morton and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Chicago Transit Authority Retiree Health Care Trust and Chicago Transit Authority Retiree Health Care Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hardin v. Chicago Transit Authority
as 1:2016cv08229
Plaintiff:
Debra Hardin
Defendant:
Chicago Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Buchanan v. Chicago Transit Authority
as 1:2016cv04577
Plaintiff:
Korey Buchanan
Defendant:
Chicago Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vargas v. Chicago Transit Authority
as 1:2015cv01789
Plaintiff:
Lisa Vargas
Defendant:
Chicago Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brooks v. Chicago Transit Authority
as 1:2014cv03343
Plaintiff:
Tina M Brooks
Defendant:
Chicago Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Duckworth, Jr. v. Chicago Transit Authority
as 1:2014cv00713
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Duckworth, Jr.
Defendant:
Chicago Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Madrigal v. Chicago Transit Authority
as 1:2014cv00568
Plaintiff:
Ismael Madrigal
Defendant:
Chicago Transit Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
