Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Terrazas et al v. DXP Enterprises, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00452
Plaintiff:
Jesus Terrazas, Robert Boutwell and Edward Ulate
Defendant:
DXP Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ian McVay v. DXP Enterprises, Inc.
as 8:2022cv01821
Plaintiff:
Ian McVay
Defendant:
DXP Enterprises, Inc. and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Marshall et al v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00022
Plaintiff:
Chris Thompson, Byron Marshall, Cory Heckard and others
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and DXP Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Saenz et al v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 7:2020cv00165
Plaintiff:
Rene Saenz and Travis Collins
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and DXP Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Marshall et al v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 7:2019cv00273
Plaintiff:
Chris Thompson, Byron Marshall, Cory Heckard and others
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and DXP Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Warden v. DXP Enterprises, Inc.
as 2:2019cv00407
Defendant:
DXP Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joshua Wayne Warden
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Van Winkle v. DXP Enterprises, Inc. Et Al
as 7:2018cv00071
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. and DXP Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jack Van Winkle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Perez v. DXP Enterprises Inc.
as 4:2017cv01187
Plaintiff:
Adalberto Perez
Defendant:
DXP Enterprises Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Ferreyro v. DXP Enterprises, Inc.
as 4:2017cv00590
Plaintiff:
Hernan Ferreyro
Defendant:
DXP Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Pena v DXP Enterprises, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00359
Defendant:
DXP Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Everett Pena and Michael Serrata
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
