Cases 1 - 8 of 8
DANZA v. PLANNED FURNITURE PROMOTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv03654
Plaintiff:
ROBERTA DANZA
Defendant:
PLANNED FURNITURE PROMOTIONS, INC. and WAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Izurieta et al v. Maxi-Aids, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00108
Plaintiff:
Karin Danza and Ursula Izurieta
Defendant:
Maxi-Aids, Inc. and Elliot Zaretsky
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Nicholas Danza v. Fidelity Management Trust Co, et al
as 12-3497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICHOLAS DANZA, individually and on behalf of defined contribution plans that used Defendants as their qualified domestic relations order service provider and all similarly situated beneficiaries of such ERISA-covered employee benefit plans
Defendant - Appellee:
FIDELITY MANAGEMENT TRUST COMPANY and FIDELITY INVESTMENTS INSTITUTIONAL OPERATIONS COMPANY INC
Garcia v. King Metal Recycling & Processing, Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv21503
Plaintiff:
Mario Garcia , Madeleidy Lebrigio , Roberto Cruz and others
Defendant:
King Metal Recycling & Processing, Corp. , Pedro L. Amador , Arturo Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
DANZA v. FMR LLC
as 1:2011cv02893
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS DANZA
Defendant:
FIDELITY MANAGEMENT TRUST COMPANY and FIDELITY INVESTMENTS INSTITUTIONAL OPERATIONS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
DANZA v. FMR LLC
as 3:2011cv02893
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS DANZA
Defendant:
FMR LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Napoto v. DHL Express (USA) Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv01551
Plaintiff:
Taina Napoto, Taina Napoto and Taina Napoto
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA) Inc., DHL Express (USA) Inc., DHL Express (USA) Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Kearse v. Hastings et al
as 1:2009cv01412
Plaintiff:
Charles Kearse
Defendant:
Annette Hastings, Vincent Danza, Milton Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
