Labor Cases filed in Pennsylvania
SMARRA v. BOILERMAKER-BLACKSMITH NATIONAL PENSION TRUST et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00860
Defendant: MICHAEL G. MORASH, BOILERMAKER-BLACKSMITH NATIONAL PENSION TRUST, DAVID J. ZACH and others
Plaintiff: SEAN SMARRA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
HAUSKNECHT et al v. JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv03911
Plaintiff: ARIC D. HAUSKNECHT , COMPLETE MEDICAL CARE SERVICES OF NY, PC and COMPLETE MEDICAL CARE SERVICES OF NY, PC HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN
Defendant: JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
HANCOCK et al v. A&R FLAG CAR SERVICE, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv06596
Plaintiff: CHRISTIAN HANCOCK and JAMES LANYON
Defendant: A&R FLAG CAR SERVICE, INC., JOHN FLAGLER and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401K RETIREMENT PLAN v. ELEVATOR SPECIALISTS OF AMERICA LLC et al
as 2:2012cv05757
Plaintiff: TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT, EDUCATIONAL, ELEVATOR INDUSTRY WORK PRESERVATION FUNDS, ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTORS ANNUITY AND 401K RETIREMENT PLAN
Defendant: ELEVATOR SPECIALISTS OF AMERICA LLC, JOSEPH HANCOCK, ROY W. ZEDER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
DODDS v. NALCO COMPANY EMPLOYEE WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN et al
as 2:2008cv01549
Plaintiff: SUSAN DODDS
Defendant: NALCO COMPANY EMPLOYEE WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN, ONDEO NALCO COMPANY EMPLOYEE WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN, SUEZ USA, INC. EMPLOYEE WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?