Cases 1 - 10 of 10
PENNYPACKER v. PRO CUSTOM SOLAR, LLC, et al
as 5:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Mr. David Pennypacker and DAVID PENNYPACKER
Defendant:
Pro Custom Solar. LLC d/b/a Momentum Solar, LLC, Arthur Souritzidis, Cameron Christensen and others
WALLS v. MILLER EDGE, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv03596
Plaintiff:
MR. MARK WALL
Defendant:
MILLER EDGE, INC., MR. JOHN CAGGIANO and MR. TIM CASTELLO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
OTERO v. HERCULES SERVICES, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv01184
Plaintiff:
EDWIN OTERO
Defendant:
HERCULES SERVICES, LLC doing business as MR. HANDYMAN OF LEHIGH VALLEY and LON ZIEGLER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Ivers v. Montgomery County Emergency Service, Inc. d/b/a Montgomery County MH-MR Service
as 2:2022cv00685
Plaintiff:
Michael Ivers
Defendant:
Montgomery County Emergency Service, Inc. d/b/a Montgomery County MH-MR Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
ROACH v. HOMELAND INTELLIGENCE AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Mr. ERIC ROACH and ERIC ROACH
Defendant:
HOMELAND INTELLIGENCE AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES, LLC, Mr. BRANDON WOMACK and BRANDON F. WOMACK
FRATANTUONO v. PHILADELPHIA TRUCK LINES, INC
as 2:2021cv04441
Plaintiff:
MR. JAMES FRATANTUONO
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA TRUCK LINES, INC
Pierce v. Monro, Inc.
as 3:2021cv01481
Plaintiff:
Matthew Pierce
Defendant:
Monro, Inc. d/b/a Mr. Tire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zhou v. Lu, et al
as 4:2021cv00682
Defendant:
Mrs. Yang Lu, Yang Lu and Wei Yu
Plaintiff:
Zhiqiong Zhou
Not Classified By Court:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Watson v. Mr. G's Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03049
Plaintiff:
Nashanda Watson
Defendant:
Mr. G's Entertainment, Inc. and Gary L. Dobrinoff
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Duggan v. MRS Associates
as 3:2010cv00211
Plaintiff:
Melanie Duggan
Defendant:
MRS Associates
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
