Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Bennett et al v. McDermott International Inc et al
as 2:2019cv00158
Defendant:
Cameron LNG, LLC, Chiyoda International Corporation, Chicago Bridge & Iron, Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Bennett, Courtlande Collins, Roger Beaumont, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada et al v. Pullen Associates Inc et al
as 2:2012cv07625
Defendant:
Nelson Algaze, Richard Jack Pullen, Pullen Associates Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Industry Fund of Los Angeles, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Health Plan of Southern California Arizona and Nevada, Board of Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local 105 Retiree Health Plan and others
Board of Trustees of the Airconditioning and Refrigeration Industry Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Pullen Associates, Inc. et al
as 8:2012cv00948
Defendant:
Nelson Algaze, Does, Richard Jack Pullen and others
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Airconditioning and Refrigeration Industry Defined Contribution Retirement Plan, Board of Trustees of the Airconditioning and Refrigeration Industry Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Board of Trustees of the Airconditioning and Refrigeration Industry Retirement Trust Fund and others
Trustees of the Southern California Pipe Trades Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Pullen Associates Inc et al
as 2:2012cv01555
Defendant:
Richard Jack Pullen and Pullen Associates Inc
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Apprentice and Journeyman Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the International Training Fund, Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund and others
Trustees of the Southern California Pipe Trades Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Pullen Associates Inc et al
as 2:2011cv08503
Defendant:
Richard Jack Pullen and Pullen Associates Inc
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Apprentice and Journeyman Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the International Training Fund, Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund and others
Trustees of the Southern California Pipe Trades Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Vision Mechanical Services Inc et al
as 2:2011cv04759
Defendant:
Richard Jack Pullen and Vision Mechanical Services Inc
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Apprentice and Journeyman Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the International Training Fund, Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund and others
Trustees of the Southern California Pipe Trades Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Vision Mechanical Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv08356
Defendant:
Richard Jack Pullen and Vision Mechanical Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Apprentice and Journeyman Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the International Training Fund, Trustees of the Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund and others
Trustees of the Southern California Pipe Trades Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Pullen Associates, Inc. et al.
as 2:2009cv03816
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Southern California Pipe Trades Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California Pipe Trades Health and Welfare Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California Pipe Trades Retirement Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Pullen Associates, Inc. and Richard Jack Pullen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Board Of Trustees Of The Airconditioning And Refrigeration Industry Health And Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Pullen Associates, Inc et al
as 8:2008cv01433
Plaintiff:
Board Of Trustees Of The Airconditioning And Refrigeration Industry Health And Welfare Trust Fund, Board of the Trustees of the Airconditioninng and Refrigeration Industry Retirement Trust Fund and Board of Trustees of the Airconditioning and Refrigeration IndustryDefined Contribution Retirement Plan
Defendant:
Pullen Associates, Inc, Richard Jack Pullen and Robyn Jane Pullen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
