Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pickrel v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 4:2022cv02873
Plaintiff:
Kevin Pickrel
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Violation of Uniform Services Employment Rights Act
Walton v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Johnathan M. Walton
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Lucas et al v. United Parcel Service Inc
as 3:2021cv02328
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lucas and Clarence Wilson
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Spivey v. United Parcel Service Flexible Benefits Plan
as 1:2020cv00751
Plaintiff:
Karen Spivey
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Flexible Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Harmon v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
as 8:2019cv02258
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company and United Parcel Service of America Incorporated Welfare Plan, The
Plaintiff:
Mark Wayland Harmon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Ingalls v. United Parcel Service Flexible Benefits Plan
as 6:2017cv01280
Plaintiff:
Michael Ingalls
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Flexible Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Bazemore v. United Parcel Service Flexible Benefits Plan
as 6:2016cv03821
Plaintiff:
Michael Bazemore
Defendant:
United Parcel Service Flexible Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Pazona v. Flexible Benefit Plan - United Parcel Service Long Term Disability Plan
as 6:2008cv03604
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Pazona
Defendant:
Flexible Benefit Plan - United Parcel Service Long Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Watson v. United Parcel Service of America Inc Flexible Benefits Plan
as 8:2007cv03692
Plaintiff:
Stephen Watson
Defendant:
United Parcel Service of America Inc Flexible Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
