Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Nido et al v. Ericsson, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv06194
Plaintiff:
Reinier Catapang, Celes Nido, Aristides Amano and others
Defendant:
4G Project People, Inc. and Ericsson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Escobar et al v. City of San Jose
as 5:2018cv01394
Plaintiff:
Daniel Escobar , David Betancourt , David Blackwell and others
Defendant:
City of San Jose
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ruben Garcia et al v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 5:2016cv01725
Plaintiff:
Ruben Garcia , Pedro Abrajan , Roman Aguilar and others
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara and Service Employees International Union Local 521
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Vo v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
as 5:2015cv02616
Plaintiff:
Nhan Vo
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Erlito S. Enoval v. AJ Huntington Home, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv00692
Defendant:
AJ Huntington Home, Inc., Ann Nguyen and John Vo
Plaintiff:
Erlito S. Enoval
Vo v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 5:2012cv05474
Plaintiff:
Vinh Vo
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Vos v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 4:2010cv05330
Plaintiff:
Virgil Vos
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Long Term Disability Plan for Non-Excluded Employees of Honeywell International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Le v. Vo et al
as 3:2007cv05193
Plaintiff:
Quyen Le
Defendant:
Anh Vo, Chau Vo, Thu Vo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Le v. Vo et al
as 3:2007cv00847
Plaintiff:
Quyen Le
Defendant:
Anh Vo, Chau Vo, Thu Vo and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
