Cases 81 - 90 of 434
Benjamin Pavone v. George Cardona, et al
as 22-55350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BENJAMIN L. PAVONE
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE CARDONA, Chief Trial Counsel, Office of the Chief Trial Counsel of the State Bar of California, LEAH WILSON, Executive Director of the State Bar of California and ANDREW VASICEK, Senior Attorney, Office of Chief Trial Counsel
Germain v. State of California et al
as 0:2022cv60601
Plaintiff:
Frantz Germain
Defendant:
State of California, Placer County, Edward Misleh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Albert v. State Bar Of California
as 1:2022mc00043
Plaintiff:
Lenore Luann Albert-Sheridan Doing business as Law Offices of Lenore Albert
Defendant:
State Bar Of California
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Leslie Westmoreland
Albert v. State Bar Of California
as 1:2022at00161
Plaintiff:
Lenore Albert
Defendant:
State Bar Of California
Hung Ha v. Trustees of State Bar of Calif
as 22-15292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HUNG HA, AKA James Ha
Defendant / Appellee:
TRUSTEES OF STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA
Craig Martin v. State Bar of California, et al
as 22-15255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG KENNETH MARTIN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, MARK TORRES-GIL, LUCY ARMENDARIZ and others
v. SHAO et al
as 2:2022at00196
Defendant:
Yi Tai SHAO, John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
A. Edward Ezor v. Betty T. Yee et al
as 2:2022cv00840
Plaintiff:
A. Edward Ezor
Defendant:
Betty T. Yee, State Bar of California, Leah T. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ha v. Trustees of State Bar of California
as 4:2022mc80028
Petitioner:
Hung Ha
Respondent:
Trustees of State Bar of California
Daniel Everett v. State Bar of California
as 22-55046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL EVERETT
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
