Cases 91 - 100 of 2,728
Brown v. Collier et al
as 7:2023cv00567
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Brown
Defendant:
Corrections Officer S. Collier, Correctional Officer S. Boggs, Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumpkin v. Clarke et al
as 1:2023cv01162
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dewayne Lumpkin
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, Virginia Attorney General, Ken Baldassari and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Burt v. Clark et al
as 1:2023cv01174
Plaintiff:
Paul Leigh Burt
Defendant:
Harold Clark, Dr. William Miles and Dr. Hench Croff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stith v. Cabell
as 2:2023cv00426
Petitioner:
Thomas D. Stith
Respondent:
Beth Cabell and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sayers v. Clark
as 7:2023cv00561
Petitioner:
Jerry David Sayers
Respondent:
Harold W. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foran v. Dotson
as 7:2023cv00556
Petitioner:
Darius Lee Foran, Sr.
Respondent:
Harold Clarke and Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butts v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00560
Petitioner:
Corey Lee Butts
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Jaamal-David Gregory Harris
Defendant:
Wellpath, LLC, HRRJ Correctional Officers, HRRJ Maintenance Officer Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Kuzminski v. Clark et al
as 1:2023cv01142
Petitioner:
Michael Robert Kuzminski
Respondent:
Harold Clark, Earles and O'Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malvo v. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Lee Malvo
Defendant:
Director Harold Clarke, Warden Rick White, Major C. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
