Cases 91 - 100 of 169
Coleman et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10589
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Coleman and Ricky Coleman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10069
Plaintiff:
Kaschandra S. Coleman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09584
Plaintiff:
Susan Coleman and Johnny Coleman
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07582
Plaintiff:
Constance M. Coleman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv04933
Plaintiff:
Michelle Coleman
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03859
Plaintiff:
Donna Coleman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman et al v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2014cv00183
Plaintiff:
Timothy D. Coleman and Theresa G. Coleman
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Coleman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv33548
Plaintiff:
Robin Corbette Coleman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv32948
Plaintiff:
Joan Miller , Mary Bratton , Patricia Hill and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adkins et al v. Medventure Technology Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv32579
Plaintiff:
Martina Adkins , Richilyn Allsup , Sharon Alvin and others
Defendant:
MedVenture Technology Corporation and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
