Cases 91 - 100 of 234
Cross v. Sweat et al
as 6:2018cv00276
Plaintiff:
Ashick Katrel Cross
Defendant:
Mable G Sweat, Michael O Casteel, Houston Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEXT Lighting Corp v. General Electric Company
as 3:2018cv01500
Plaintiff:
NEXT Lighting Corp
Defendant:
General Electric Company
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Holmes v. Shabazz et al CASE TRANSFERRED TO TYLER DIVISION.
as 1:2018cv00243
Plaintiff:
Eric-Cantrell Holmes
Defendant:
Akbar Shabazz, Dan Rose, FNU Light and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Shabazz et al
as 6:2018cv00262
Plaintiff:
Eric-Cantrell Holmes
Defendant:
Akbar Shabazz, Dan Rose, FNU Light and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lexington Luminance LLC v. Service Lighting and Electrical Supplies Inc
as 3:2018cv01074
Plaintiff:
Lexington Luminance LLC
Defendant:
Service Lighting and Electrical Supplies Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Elation Lighting, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00097
Plaintiff:
Ultravision Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Elation Lighting, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Marcus et al
as 4:2018mc00008
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission and State of Florida
Defendant:
Jeremy Lee Marcus, Craig Davis Smith, Yisbet Segrea and others
Seoul Semiconductor Co Ltd et al v. Service Lighting and Electrical Supplies Inc
as 3:2018cv00508
Plaintiff:
Seoul Semiconductor Co Ltd and Seoul Viosys Co Ltd
Defendant:
Service Lighting and Electrical Supplies Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Alamo Lights, LLC v. Four Bros Lighting and Bulbs, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00187
Plaintiff:
Alamo Lights, LLC
Defendant:
Four Bros Lighting and Bulbs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
RetroLED Components, LLC v. Principal Lighting Group, LLC
as 6:2018cv00055
Defendant:
Principal Lighting Group, LLC
Plaintiff:
RetroLED Components, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
