Cases 91 - 100 of 169
Bechtol et al v. Up In Smoke, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv03083
Plaintiff:
Lew Bechtol , Laura Anne Bechtol , Steven Scott Schwartz and others
Defendant:
Up In Smoke Inc , Daniel L Schmitt and Carol A Schmitt
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Abston et al v. Baxter & Schwartz PC et al
as 4:2014cv02283
Plaintiff:
Floyd Abston, Jr. and Gisele Abston
Defendant:
Baxter & Schwartz PC, Shapiro & Schwartz LLP, H Gray Burks, IV and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Abston et al v. Baxter & Schwartz PC et al
as 4:2014mc01916
Plaintiff:
Floyd Abston, Jr and Gisele Abston
Defendant:
Baxter & Schwartz PC, Shapiro & Schwartz LLP, H Gray Burks, IV and others
Searcy et al v. CitiMortgage Inc et al
as 3:2014cv02744
Plaintiff:
Faye M Searcy and Bobby C Searcy
Defendant:
CitiMortgage Inc and Shapiro Schwartz LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bell v. CitiMortgage, Inc., et al
as 5:2014cv00531
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Bell and Dora Estevez
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc., Deborah Martin and Shapiro Schwartz, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Nichols v. City of Seabrook et al.
as 4:2014cv01591
Plaintiff:
Barbara Nichols
Defendant:
City of Seabrook and Austin Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv01093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv00031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
