Cases 91 - 100 of 558
German v. Outlaw et al
as 3:2016cv00288
Petitioner:
Cherelle German
Respondent:
Timothy Outlaw and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Griffin v. Fisher et al
as 4:2016cv00227
Petitioner:
Jamie Griffin
Respondent:
Marshall Fisher and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pruitt v. Fisher et al
as 1:2016cv00199
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Pruitt
Respondent:
Marshall Fisher and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vaughn v. Fisher et al
as 3:2016cv00237
Petitioner:
Marcus Vaughn
Respondent:
Marshall Fisher and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Lee et al
as 4:2016cv00207
Petitioner:
Mario Harris
Respondent:
Earnest Lee and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cooper v. Morris et al
as 4:2016cv00195
Petitioner:
Jonathan D. Cooper
Respondent:
Timothy Morris and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: State of Mississippi
as 16-60610
Petitioner:
In re: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ex rel, Jim Hood, Attorney General for the State of Mississippi
Defendant - Respondent:
ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INCORPORATED, ENTERGY CORPORATION, ENTERGY SERVICES, INCORPORATED and others
Fitzpatrick v. Banks et al
as 3:2016cv00200
Petitioner:
Franklin Fitzpatrick
Respondent:
Jacauelyn Banks and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. Lee et al
as 4:2016cv00177
Petitioner:
Larry Cook
Respondent:
Earnest Lee and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McLymont v. Fisher et al
as 4:2016cv00176
Petitioner:
David McLymont
Respondent:
Marshall Fisher and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
