Cases 91 - 100 of 298
EDDINGTON v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
as 1:2019cv02942
Plaintiff:
PATRICK EDDINGTON
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ASHFORD v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2019cv02417
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, LARRY VOLZ, DC PUBLIC LIBRARY POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY ASHFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. REPUBLIC OF FRANCE et al
as 1:2019cv02358
Respondent:
REPUBLIC OF FRANCE, ORLANDO HARPER, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AMERICAN OVERSIGHT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE et al
as 1:2019cv02169
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE and U.S. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN OVERSIGHT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
ADAMS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ARMY et al
as 1:2019cv02188
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, UNITED STATES CIA INFORMATION AND PRIVACY COORDINATOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ARMY and others
Plaintiff:
DALE B. ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
BANKS v. NPR NEWS MORNING EDITION et al
as 1:2019cv02052
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, GINA HOSPEL, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
LEADER v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
as 1:2019cv01679
Plaintiff:
ELISABETH LEADER
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BEVILL v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2019cv01280
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF STATE and CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Plaintiff:
MARY JOANNE SPRINGER BEVILL
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
MILCETIC v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
as 1:2019cv01165
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Plaintiff:
PAUL BORIS MILCETIC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
LEOPOLD et al v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
as 1:2019cv00978
Plaintiff:
JASON LEOPOLD and BUZZFEED, INC.
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
