Cases 91 - 100 of 123
Howard v. Wilkes et al
as 4:2010cv00048
Plaintiff:
Lamont Howard
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes, Ayaz Chaudhary, Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Wilkes et al
as 3:2010cv00024
Plaintiff:
Lamont Howard
Defendant:
Scott Wilkes, Ayaz Chaudhary, Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Barrow
as 7:2009cv00144
Petitioner:
Chad Shaw
Respondent:
Donald Barrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Barrow et al
as 3:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
David Timothy Moore
Defendant:
Donald Barrow, Misty Winter, Sam Zanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Barrow et al
as 4:2009cv00125
Petitioner:
Borish Jenkins
Respondent:
Donald Barrow and Thurbert Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Copeland v. Barrow
as 1:2009cv01893
Petitioner:
Reggie D. Copeland
Respondent:
Donald Barrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Clevenger v. Barrow
as 1:2009cv01803
Petitioner:
Cory L. Clevenger
Respondent:
Donald Barrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Cobb v. Kilgore et al
as 5:2009cv00207
Plaintiff:
Kerry Reginald Cobb
Defendant:
Connie Kilgore, S Crowe, G Yancey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lowery v. Barrows
as 1:2009cv00070
Petitioner:
William Junior Lowery
Respondent:
Donald Barrows
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Copeland v. Barrow
as 1:2009cv01225
Petitioner:
Reggie Deon Copeland
Respondent:
Donald Barrow and Donald Barrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
