Cases 91 - 100 of 111
Nelson-Clark et al v. Bayer Corporation et al
as 3:2010cv11701
Plaintiff:
Mary Nelson-Clark , Kelli Griffith , Amanda Farmer and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffith et al v. Consumer Porfolio Services, Inc.
as 1:2010cv02697
Plaintiff:
Roslyn Griffith and Jerret Cain
Defendant:
Consumer Porfolio Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Griffith v. United States of America
as 3:2009cv00924
Petitioner:
Carl J. Griffith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Griffith v. The Rock Island Boatworks, Inc.
as 4:2009cv04078
Plaintiff:
Donna M Griffith
Defendant:
The Rock Island Boatworks, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Adebowale v. Griffith et al
as 1:2009cv05138
Plaintiff:
Adeoye Adebowale
Defendant:
Wallace A. Griffith, McDaniels, Supervising Sergeant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Sanchez v. A. et al
as 1:2009cv01148
Plaintiff:
Matilde Sanchez
Defendant:
H. A., Gerardo Soenada, S Best and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriquez v. Migliorino et al
as 1:2009cv01118
Plaintiff:
Jorge A Rodriquez, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Migliorino, Geraldo Acevedo, Lois L Mathes and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv03014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv05379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
