Cases 91 - 100 of 118
Gregorio Lopez v. Jeanne Woodford et al
as 2:2007cv04261
Plaintiff:
Gregorio Lopez
Defendant:
Jeanne Woodford, Arnold Schwarzenegger and Debra Dexter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Marcus Eduardo Mendiola v. Jeanne Woodford
as 2:2007cv04212
Petitioner:
Marcos Eduardo Mendiola
Respondent:
Jeanne Woodford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lane v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv01148
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Lane
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Jeanne Woodford and State Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Andrew Jackson v. Jeanne Woodford et al
as 5:2007cv00704
Petitioner:
John Andrew Jackson
Respondent:
Jeanne Woodford and Victor Almager
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pamer v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 3:2007cv02837
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Harry Pamer
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jeanne Woodford, Rod Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodriguez v. Woodford
as 5:2007cv02235
Petitioner:
Russell Gene Rodriguez
Respondent:
Jeanne Woodford
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
George E Jacobs IV v. Jeanne Woodford et al
as 2:2007cv02618
Plaintiff:
George E Jacobs, IV
Defendant:
Jeanne Woodford, C M Harrison, N Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Holms v. Hickman et al
as 2:2007cv00390
Defendant:
I. Cardeno, Matthew C. Kramer, J. Dunlap, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Jeffrey Gautier and Norma Lee Holms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce v. Woodford, et al.
as 1:2007cv00269
Plaintiff:
Vincent C. Bruce
Defendant:
Jeanne Woodford, Derral G. Adams, Eddie Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heang v. Woodford
as 3:2007cv00980
Petitioner:
Van Hang Heang
Respondent:
Jeanne Woodford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
