Cases 91 - 100 of 108
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. ATLANTIC 3 CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
as 2:2008cv02814
Plaintiff:
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL HEAVY AND HIGHWAY HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
ATLANTIC 3 CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. DEVLIN EXCAVATING, LLC
as 2:2008cv01782
Plaintiff:
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, THE LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
Defendant:
DEVLIN EXCAVATING, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, LOCAL NO. 199 WELFARE, PENSION, APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING, VACATION, ANNUITY AND LABORERS-EMPLOYERS COOPERATIVE EDUCATION TRUST FUNDS et al v. RSK CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC.
as 2:2008cv01130
Plaintiff:
LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, LOCAL NO. 199 WELFARE, PENSION, APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING, VACATION, ANNUITY AND LABORERS-EMPLOYERS COOPERATIVE EDUCATION TRUST FUNDS and LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, LOCAL NO. 199
Defendant:
RSK CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. ALL TYPES OF CONSTRUCTION, LLC
as 5:2008cv00796
Plaintiff:
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, THE LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
Defendant:
ALL TYPES OF CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. PROCORE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2008cv00795
Plaintiff:
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, THE LABORERS DISTRICT COUNCIL BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
Defendant:
PROCORE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, LOCAL UNION NO. 1174 v. TOTAL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CO., INC.
as 5:2008cv00002
Plaintiff:
LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, LOCAL UNION NO. 1174
Defendant:
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. C. AMODEI COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2007cv04731
Plaintiff:
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL HEAVY AND HIGHWAY HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
Defendant:
C. AMODEI COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND et al v. PLYMOUTH VALLEY PAVING
as 2:2007cv04188
Plaintiff:
THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY PENSION FUND, THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL HEAVY AND HIGHWAY HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, THE LABORERS' DISTRICT COUNCIL EDUCATION AND TRAINING FUND and others
Defendant:
PLYMOUTH VALLEY PAVING
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
