Cases 91 - 100 of 786
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Zhuhai RaySharp Technology Co., Ltd.
as 6:2022cv01030
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Zhuhai RaySharp Technology Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. MediaTek Inc.
as 6:2022cv01029
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
MediaTek Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Renesas Electronics Corporation
as 6:2022cv01031
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Renesas Electronics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Headspeth v Akin et al
as 4:2022cv00875
Plaintiff:
Robin Headspeth
Defendant:
N Lane Akin, Brandon S. Wood and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FILING ERROR
as 6:2022cv00966
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Uniview Technology
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. TKH Security B.V.
as 6:2022cv00963
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
TKH Security B.V.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Urmet S.p.A.
as 6:2022cv00967
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Urmet S.p.A.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Vanguard Integrated Solutions Ltd.
as 6:2022cv00968
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Vanguard Integrated Solutions Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Tattile s.r.l.
as 6:2022cv00962
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Tattile s.r.l.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc. v. Vimar SpA
as 6:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
Cedar Lane Technologies Inc.
Defendant:
Vimar SpA
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
