Cases 91 - 100 of 119
QUINLAN et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2008cv01947
Plaintiff:
NANETTE QUINLAN and JIM QUINLAN
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., AVENTIS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
DOE v. RUMSFELD et al
as 1:2008cv01902
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
DONALD RUMSFELD, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, ROBERT S. MUELLER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MYERS v. BYRD et al
as 1:2008cv01793
Plaintiff:
GLORIA MYERS
Defendant:
RODNEY BYRD, IRVING MILLARD, DERON MERCER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LEE v. CHERTOFF et al
as 1:2008cv01712
Plaintiff:
SANG HO LEE
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, W. RALPH BASHAM, JULIE L. MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
STRAUSS v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2008cv01707
Plaintiff:
RANDI SUSAN STRAUSS
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, DART INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ROSS et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2008cv01686
Plaintiff:
DONNA ROSS and DAVID ROSS
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ALLAITHI v. RUMSFELD et al
as 1:2008cv01677
Plaintiff:
SAMI ABDULAZIZ ALLAITHI
Defendant:
DONALD RUMSFELD, RICHARD MYERS, JAMES T. HILL and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BROMFIELD v. MYERS et al
as 1:2008cv01639
Plaintiff:
DAMION BROMFIELD
Defendant:
JULIE MYERS, JOHN P. TORRES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ZUKOWSKI et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 1:2008cv01647
Plaintiff:
EVE M. ZUKOWSKI and JOHN L. LIPPMAN
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, KREMERS-URBAN CO. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
GUARDIOLA-HERNANDEZ v. MYERS et al
as 1:2008cv01595
Plaintiff:
ALBINO GUARDIOLA-HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
JULIE MYERS, JOHN P. TORRES, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
