Cases 91 - 100 of 690
Solomon v. Carrasco et al
as 2:2011cv02319
Plaintiff:
Vincente Solomon
Defendant:
M. Carrasco, J Heil, C. Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chance v. Cate et al
as 3:2011cv04279
Plaintiff:
David Chance
Defendant:
Matthew L. Cate, Robert A. Horel, Francisco Jacquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Rowe v. R. Banks, et al
as 11-17077
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL ROWE
Defendant - Appellee:
R. BANKS, Correction Officer, Corcoran State Prison, M. LOPEZ, Correctional Sergeant, Corcoran State Prison, WARDEN, Corcoran State Prison and others
Gray v. Tilton et al
as 2:2011cv02103
Plaintiff:
Ricky Gray
Defendant:
James Tilton, Robert Wong, Matthew Cates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miranda v. Cate et al
as 3:2011cv03749
Plaintiff:
Jerry M. Miranda
Defendant:
M. Cate, R. S. Marquez, S. Kernan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvaro Quezada v. B Gricewich, et al
as 11-16782
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALVARO QUEZADA
Defendant - Appellee:
B GRICEWICH, N. GRANNIS and TAKAHASHI, Correctional Officer
Andrade v. Lewis et al
as 5:2011cv03528
Plaintiff:
Adrian Frank Andrade
Defendant:
Greg Lewis, Francisco Jacquez, D. Barneburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byron Johnson v. David Runnels, et al
as 11-16697
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BYRON EUGENE JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID L. RUNNELS, RODERICK HICKMAN, Youth and Adult Correctional Secretary, RICHARD A. RIMMER, Former Director of CDC and others
Harold McDaniel v. Randy Grounds, et al
as 11-16672
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD P. MCDANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY GROUNDS, Warden, Warden, DAN CARNAZZO, C & PR Staff, P. MULLEN, Appeal Staff and others
Otis Thomas v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 11-56098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OTIS MICHAEL THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, California Governor, N. GRANNIS, Chief of Inmate Appeals, P. ENRIQUEZ, Facility Captain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
