Cases 91 - 100 of 221
Tenagila v. Luxottica Retail North America
as 1:2017cv06315
Plaintiff:
Gracelynn Tenagila
Defendant:
Luxottica Retail North America and Luxottica Retail North America an Ohio corporation doing business as Lenscrafters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05417
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moshir v. NEOCC et al
as 1:2017cv00625
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
NEOCC, CCA/Core Civic, Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company et al v. Morelli et al
as 1:2017mc00223
Petitioner:
The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and Liberty Insurance Underwriters, Inc.
Respondent:
Benedict P Morelli and Michael K. Rozen
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Moshir v. Counselor Sauline et al
as 1:2017cv00551
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
Sauline, Sullivan, NEOCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moshir v. Captain Conley et al
as 1:2017cv00525
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
Captain Conley, United States Marshal, Warden Larose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moshir v. NEOCC et al
as 1:2017cv00527
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
NEOCC, CCA/Core Civic, Federal Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moshir v. NEOCC et al
as 1:2017cv00524
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
NEOCC, CCA/Core Civic, Captain Dragovich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodges v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2017cv04219
Plaintiff:
Yaisha F. Hodges
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Ohio Civil Rights Commission, Freddie Rufus and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mosher v. Officer Thake et al
as 1:2017cv00491
Plaintiff:
Ali Moshir
Defendant:
Officer Thake, NEOCC, Core Civic/CCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
