Cases 91 - 100 of 1,158
Dinardo v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02503
Plaintiff:
Pamela Dinardo
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abbott et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02302
Plaintiff:
Donna Abbott , Machele Abbott , Anthony Akers and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc. and Sperry Rail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Foltz v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02135
Plaintiff:
Pamela Foltz
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sherman et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02183
Plaintiff:
Pamela Sherman and Frank Sherman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson v. Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
as 2:2017cv02049
Plaintiff:
Pamela Simpson
Defendant:
Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Toney v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01875
Plaintiff:
Pamela D. Toney
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01886
Plaintiff:
Pamela Phillips
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cadotte v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01582
Plaintiff:
Pamela Cadotte
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook et al v. Cornett et al
as 2:2017cv01542
Petitioner:
Pamela M. Cook and Roy Dolin
Respondent:
Sandra Cornett , Randell Dolin , Richard Dolin and others
Counter_claimant:
Randell Dolin , Richard Dolin , Roy Dolin and others
Counter_defendant:
Pamela M. Cook and Roy Dolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Heiman et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2017cv01533
Plaintiff:
Pamela J. Heiman and Randy Heinman
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
