Cases 91 - 100 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Delgado v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00029
Plaintiff:
Rosa Delgado
Defendant:
Pathmark Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Schaefer v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.
as 1:2008cv00030
Plaintiff:
Linda Schaefer
Defendant:
Pathmark Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
IMPARATO v. PATHMARK STORES INC. et al
as 1:2007cv06044
Plaintiff:
THOMAS IMPARATO
Defendant:
PATHMARK STORES INC., STUMAR INVESTIGATIONS, JIM PIERCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Williams v. Pathmark of Starrett City
as 1:2007cv05111
Plaintiff:
Shalonda Williams
Defendant:
Pathmark of Starrett City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Remy v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.
as 1:2007cv04756
Plaintiff:
Marie Remy
Defendant:
Pathmark Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Patton et al v. Topps Meat Company, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv00654
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Patton, Jimmy Patton, Jimmy Patton and others
Defendant:
Topps Meat Company, LLC, Walmart Stores, Inc., Pathmark Stores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morales v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.
as 1:2007cv08236
Plaintiff:
Rosa Morales
Defendant:
Pathmark Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Decaille v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.
as 1:2007cv03605
Plaintiff:
Sheba Decaille
Defendant:
Pathmark Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Thomas v. Pathmark Stores, Inc.
as 1:2007cv02941
Plaintiff:
Victoria Thomas
Defendant:
Pathmark Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
