Cases 91 - 100 of 158
Julian de Medeiros v. James Yates, et al
as 10-15919
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIAN GAGO DE MEDEIROS
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, PLEASANT VALLEY STATE PRISON, GAIL LEWIS and others
Milos Klvana v. Warden of Pleasant Valley State Prison et al
as 2:2010cv02452
Petitioner:
Milos Klvana
Respondent:
Los Angeles County, State of California and Warden of Pleasant Valley State Prison
Klvana v. Warden of Pleasant Valley State Prison et al
as 1:2010cv00540
Petitioner:
Milos Klvana
Respondent:
Warden of Pleasant Valley State Prison, State of California and Los Angeles County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Soton Chan v. James Yate
as 10-55285
Petitioner - Appellant:
SOTON CHAN
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, Warden of Pleasant Valley State Prison
Barry Jameson v. James Yate
as 10-55132
Petitioner - Appellant:
BARRY SIMON JAMESON
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, Warden of Pleasant Valley State Prison
Camarena v. Diep et al
as 1:2010cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jesse Camarena
Defendant:
Joan Diep, Marshall S. Lewis, Pleasant Valley State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGuire v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 1:2009cv02261
Plaintiff:
Shannon L. McGuire
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jerry Brown, Matthew Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGuire v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2009cv03545
Plaintiff:
Shannon L. McGuire
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jerry Brown, Matthew Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose Calderon v. James Yates, et al
as 09-56839
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE CALDERON
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES and PLEASANT VALLEY STATE PRISON
Victor Hernandez v. James Yate
as 09-17390
Petitioner - Appellant:
VICTOR HERNANDEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES YATES, Warden Pleasant Valley State Prison
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
