Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 256
Teijin Limited et al v. Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited et al
as 1:2014cv00117
Plaintiff: Teijin Limited , Teijin Pharma Limited and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc.
Defendant: Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited , Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Ranbaxy Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Karly Greenshields v. Hoffman-La Roche Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2014cv00157
Plaintiff: Karly Greenshields
Defendant: Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. , Roche Laboratories, Inc. , Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fraternal Order of Police Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31 Insurance Trust Fund v. Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2014cv00116
Plaintiff: Fraternal Order of Police Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31 Insurance Trust Fund
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharamceutcials, U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re ACTOS Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv09244
Plaintiff: 199 SEIU-National Benefit Fund, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health a and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, City of Providence, Rhode Island, Crosby Tugs, LLC and others
Defendant: Actavis plc, Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Mylan, Inc. and others
Consolidated Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider: Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Inc. and American Sales Company, LLC
Amicus Curiae: Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract
Crosby Tugs, L.L.C. v. Takeda Pharamceutical Co. Ltd. et al
as 1:2013cv09250
Plaintiff: Crosby Tugs, L.L.C.
Defendant: Takeda Pharamceutical Co. Ltd., Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharamceuticals, U.S.A., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re: Nexium Antitrust Litiga
as 13-8046
Petitioner: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA AB, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and others
Respondent: AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC., MEIJER, INC. and others
Karly Greenshields v. Hoffman-La Roche Inc et al
as CAC/2:13-cv-09206
Plaintiff: Karly Greenshields
Defendant: Hoffman-La Roche Inc , Roche Laboratories Inc , Ranbaxy Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Karly Greenshields v. Hoffman-La Roche Inc et al
as 2:2013cv09206
Defendant: Cardinal Health 409 Inc, Does, Genpharm ULC and others
Plaintiff: Karly Greenshields
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 13-8044
Respondent: INTERNATIONAL UNION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS DISTRICT NO. 15 HEALTH FUND, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 17 HEALTH CARE FUND, A.F. OF L. - A.G.C. BUILDING TRADES WELFARE PLAN and others
Plaintiff: SUPERVALU, INC., MEIJER, INC., KROGER COMPANY and others
Petitioner: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICAL LP, TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., RANBAXY INC. and others
Interested Party: CAREMARKPCS, LLC and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Intervenor: EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
In re: Nexium Antitrust
as 13-8044
Plaintiff - Respondent: ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 17 HEALTH CARE FUND, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 35 HEALTH CARE FUND and others
Plaintiff: AMERICAN SALES COMPANY, LLC, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, VALUE DRUG COMPANY, BURLINGTON DRUG COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant - Petitioner: ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA AB, AKTIEBOLAGET HASSLE and others
Interested Party: CAREMARKPCS HEALTH, LLC and MCKESSON CORPORATION
Intervenor: EXPRESS SCRIPTS, INC. and CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?