Cases 91 - 100 of 149
Young v. Reese
as 5:2007cv00225
Plaintiff:
James Young
Defendant:
Constance Reese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Banks v. Williams et al
as 5:2007cv00226
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
"Unknown" Williams, Constance Reese, Unknown Holston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Lee v. Reese
as 1:2007cv00313
Petitioner:
Milton A. Lee
Respondent:
Constance Reese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anthony v. Reese et al
as 5:2007cv00221
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Anthony
Defendant:
Constance Reese and Unknown Roth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Banks v. Reese et al
as 5:2007cv00220
Plaintiff:
Frederick H. Banks
Defendant:
Constance Reese, Christopher Curry, Eden White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Berlin v. Reese
as 5:2007cv00215
Plaintiff:
Andy Erwin Berlin
Defendant:
Constance Reese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hicks v. Lauderdale County Jail et al
as 4:2007cv00147
Plaintiff:
Johnny Hicks
Defendant:
Lauderdale County Jail, Lauderdale County Board of Supervisors, Billie Sollie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberson v. Reese
as 5:2007cv00208
Plaintiff:
Martin Roberson
Defendant:
Constance Reese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Banks et al v. Merck & Co., Inc.
as 1:2007cv00268
Plaintiff:
Charles Banks, Delores Bird, Janette Downs and others
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Steele v. State of Alabama et al
as 5:2007cv00195
Plaintiff:
Shannon X. Steele
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Constance Reese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
