Cases 91 - 100 of 100
(PC)Cannavan v. Newsom et al
as 1:2026cv06051
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Cannavan
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, CDCR Division of Adult Services, Jeff Macomber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08464
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv07973
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
(PC) Cannavan v. Newsom et al
as 1:2026cv06034
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Cannavan
Defendant:
Gov. Gavin Newsom, CDCR Division of Adult Services, Jeff Macomber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Cannavan v. Newsom et al
as 1:2026cv06035
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Cannavan
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, CDCR Division of Adult Services, Jeff Macomber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Lee v. Department of the Treasury et al
as 3:2026cv07980
Plaintiff:
June Lee
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv07928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
