Cases 91 - 100 of 154
Roberts v. McCain et al
as 2:2017cv06198
Plaintiff:
Wilford Roberts
Defendant:
Sandy McCain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Young v. Sandy McCain, Warden, et al
as 17-30521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
SANDY MCCAIN, WARDEN, RAYMOND LABORDE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, in official & individual capacity, MATTHEW GAMBLE, Treating Psychiatrist, in official & individual capacity, TIM CRAWFORD, Major, in official & individual capacity and others
Eddie Dominguez v. Sandy McCain, Warden
as 17-30460
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDDIE DOMINGUEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
SANDY MCCAIN, WARDEN, RAYMOND LABORDE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Lawrence Williams v. Sandy McCain, Warden
as 17-30408
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAWRENCE WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
SANDY MCCAIN, WARDEN, RAYMOND LABORDE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Taylor v. McCain et al
as 2:2017cv04819
Plaintiff:
Perrin Taylor
Defendant:
Sandy McCain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kevin Mayon v. Sandy McCain, Warden
as 17-30349
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN MAYON
Respondent - Appellee:
SANDY MCCAIN, WARDEN, RAYMOND LABORDE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Davis v. McCain et al
as 1:2017cv00489
Plaintiff:
Nolan C Davis, Sr
Defendant:
Sandy McCain, Rodney Slay, Troy Poret and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowens v. McCain et al
as 2:2017cv02648
Plaintiff:
Durrelle D. Bowens
Defendant:
Sandy McCain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sean Watts v. Sandy McCain, Warden
as 17-30213
Petitioner - Appellant:
SEAN WATTS
Respondent - Appellee:
SANDY MCCAIN, WARDEN, RAYMOND LABORDE CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Mcdowell v. McVea et al
as 1:2017cv00352
Plaintiff:
Gerald Mcdowell
Defendant:
Casey McVea, Myrna Cooper, Sandy McCain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
