Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 91 - 100 of 110
HIGHTOWER v. LEVI
as 2:2007cv02743
Petitioner: KEITH HIGHTOWER
Respondent: TROY LEVI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MILHOUSE v. LEVI
as 2:2007mc00106
Plaintiff: KAREEM HASSAN MILHOUSE
Defendant: TROY LEVI
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
LAWRENCE v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv02327
Petitioner: MARK LAWRENCE
Respondent: TROY LEVI and ALBERTO GONZALES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
D'AMARIO v. LEVI
as 2:2007cv02091
Petitioner: ARTHUR D'AMARIO, III
Respondent: TROY LEVI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
RUSSELL v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv01799
Plaintiff: JAMES A. RUSSELL
Defendant: TROY LEVI, TRACY BROWN, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MINES v. LEVI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01739
Plaintiff: RASHEEN MINES
Defendant: TROY LEVI, TRACEY BROWN and MARTINEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILHOUSE v. ARBASAK et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv01442
Plaintiff: KAREEM HASSAN MILHOUSE
Defendant: R. ARBASAK, D. DEMPSEY, J. GIBBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARDY v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv01228
Petitioner: PAUL HARDY
Respondent: TROY LEVI and ALBERTO GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
AVILES v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv01115
Plaintiff: ANGEL AVILES
Defendant: TROY LEVI, TRACEY BROWN, KNOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABDULLAH v. LEVI et al
as 2:2007cv00797
Petitioner: AMIR ABDULLAH
Respondent: TROY LEVI and ALBERTO GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?