Cases 91 - 100 of 4,547
Matthews v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00656
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Renae Matthews
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Lawrence v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00851
Plaintiff:
Greta B. Lawrence
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Isaac v. USA
as 2:2023cv00643
Petitioner:
Justin Michael Isaac
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Mason v. USA
as 6:2023cv81543
Petitioner:
James Noland Mason
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Kampf v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00821
Plaintiff:
Lyle Brent Kampf
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Richmond (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Lawrence v. O'Malley
as 2:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
Alvinita Lamour Lawrence
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration) and Norfolk-NN (IP) USA - SS 405g Notice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Talens v. USA
as 2:2023cv00620
Petitioner:
Lori Ann Talens
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bates v. USA
as 3:2023cv00817
Petitioner:
Christopher Robin Bates
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McMahon v. USA
as 4:2023cv00149
Petitioner:
Michael McMahon
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
