Cases 91 - 100 of 527
Werts et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2019cv01463
Plaintiff:
Donald Werts and Billie J. Werts
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRISON et al v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 2:2019cv03545
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MORRISON and DANA MORRISON
Defendant:
WAL-MART SUPERCENTER #3541 and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WILSON v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 2:2019cv03217
Plaintiff:
DENISE WILSON
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DUBOSE v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 2:2019cv02876
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN DUBOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carter v. Wal-Mart USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00937
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Carter
Defendant:
Wal-Mart USA, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MADDEN v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
as 2:2019cv02252
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., WALMART INC., WALMART STORES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MADDEN and MADELL MADDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BADMAN v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv02168
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC., WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and STORE
Plaintiff:
NAOMI M. BADMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COSBY v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP et al
as 2:2019cv01406
Plaintiff:
SANDRA COSBY
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
FRENKEL et al v. WALMART STORE #2480 et al
as 3:2019cv00525
Plaintiff:
IRINA FRENKEL and ALEXANDER FRENKEL
Defendant:
WALMART STORE #2480, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and Wal-mart stores east lp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
