Cases 91 - 100 of 7,571
2018-2 1H Borrower LP v. Freeman et al
as 1:2024cv01066
Defendant:
Marshall Freeman and Desiree Williams
Plaintiff:
2018-2 1H Borrower LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Pye v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
William James Pye
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Christopher Carr, State Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 U.S. Services Employment/Reemployment Act of 1994
Rayburn v. Propzu, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01042
Plaintiff:
William Rayburn
Defendant:
Propzu, Inc. and Jason Saphire
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Williams v. Drury Hotels Company, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00991
Plaintiff:
Briana Williams
Defendant:
Drury Hotels Company, LLC, Drury Partnership 2010 LLLP and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Williams v. Sam's West, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00990
Plaintiff:
Deborah Williams
Defendant:
Sam's West, Inc. doing business as Tucker Sam's Club #6409, ABC Corps #1-3 and John Does #1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
In re Subpoena to FindIt, Inc.
as 1:2024mi00018
Plaintiff:
Adam Ferrari
Defendant:
William Francis
Respondent:
FindIt, Inc.
Williams v. Kemp et al
as 1:2024cv00965
Plaintiff:
Curtis Andrew Williams
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Tyrone Oliver, Michael W. Nail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denbo v. Prime Rangers, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
Christian Denbo
Defendant:
Prime Rangers, Inc. and Rinnel Williams
Williams v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00850
Petitioner:
Angela Brady Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
