Cases 91 - 100 of 212
Zhang v. Groupon, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02450
Plaintiff:
Fan Zhang
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc. , Andrew D. Mason , Jason E. Child and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Evolutionary Intelligence, LLC v. Groupon, Inc.
as 3:2013cv04204
Plaintiff:
Evolutionary Intelligence, LLC
Defendant:
Groupon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Online News Link LLC v. Groupon Inc.
as 1:2013cv01436
Plaintiff:
Online News Link LLC
Defendant:
Groupon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
IN RE: GROUPON, INC., MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
as 3:2011md02238
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ferreira , Heather Kimel , Brian Zard and others
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc. , Nordstom Inc , DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Klever Marketing, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc.
as 6:2013cv00476
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Klever Marketing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Blue Calypso, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc.
as 6:2013cv00455
Plaintiff:
Blue Calypso, Inc.
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Groupon, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Blue Calypso, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Blue Calypso, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc.
as 6:2013cv00426
Plaintiff:
Blue Calypso, Inc.
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
MacCormack et al v. Groupon Inc.
as 1:2013cv00940
Plaintiff:
Brian MacCormack and Michael Traugutt
Defendant:
Groupon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Blue Calypso, Inc. v. Groupon, Inc.
as 6:2013cv00372
Defendant:
Groupon, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Blue Calypso, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Lalo v. Apple, Inc et al
as 5:2010cv05878
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lalo , Dustin Freeman , Jared Parsley and others
Defendant:
Apple, Inc , Backflip , Dictionary.com and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
