Cases 91 - 100 of 5,395
Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al v. MIM Software Inc.
as 1:2024cv10437
Plaintiff:
Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and EXINI Diagnostics AB
Defendant:
MIM Software Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Overjet, Inc. v. VideaHealth, Inc.
as 1:2024cv10446
Plaintiff:
Overjet, Inc.
Defendant:
VideaHealth, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Uncommon Grounds Coffee & Tea, Inc. v. Uncommon Grounds, Inc.
as 1:2024cv10420
Plaintiff:
Uncommon Grounds Coffee & Tea, Inc.
Defendant:
Uncommon Grounds, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Bok-Hee v. Swarovski North America
as 1:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Kim Bok-Hee
Defendant:
Swarovski North America
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Webcon Vectors LLC v. GoTo Technologies USA, LLC
as 1:2024cv10395
Plaintiff:
Webcon Vectors LLC
Defendant:
GoTo Technologies USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
IQE KC, LLC v. Akoustis Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2024mc91053
Plaintiff:
IQE KC, LLC
Defendant:
Akoustis Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
RecepTrexx LLC v. GoTo Technologies USA, LLC
as 1:2024cv10288
Plaintiff:
RecepTrexx LLC
Defendant:
GoTo Technologies USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
RecepTrexx LLC v. Ringover Inc.
as 1:2024cv10271
Plaintiff:
RecepTrexx LLC
Defendant:
Ringover Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Boston Inventions, LLC v. Apple Inc.
as 1:2024cv10275
Plaintiff:
Boston Inventions, LLC
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
VIRTUE PAINTBALL LLC v. MESSER et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
VIRTUE PAINTBALL LLC
Defendant:
ROBERT BRETT MESSER, BLACK ZEBRA STUDIOS and JOHN DOES 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
