Cases 91 - 100 of 1,456
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ewell et al v. Clark et al
as 6:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Neville Ewell, II, Donta Davis and Samuel Washington
Defendant:
Shannon Clark, Okmulgee County Criminal Justice Authority, Lino Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Edwards et al
as 6:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Harris
Defendant:
Donnie Edwards, Leflore County Detention Center Public Trust, Jessica Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowman v. Christian et al
as 6:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Gage Bowman
Defendant:
Johnnie Christian, Cody Liverman, Phillips Dilan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00251
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rahhal v. Banc First, The et al
as 6:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
Birdella Love Rahhal
Defendant:
Banc First, The, Homeland Grocery Store, The, Prague Clinic, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00224
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Vanwinkle v. Bennett et al
as 6:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Ryan Vanwinkle
Defendant:
John Bennett, Haley Robinson, John David Lutton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
