Cases 91 - 100 of 120,504
(HC) Corderick v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00546
Petitioner:
Dewayne Gage Corderick
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Truschke-Harpster v. Tuolumne County Jail
as 1:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Tammi Truschke-Harpster
Defendant:
Tuolumne County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irving Aguilar-Calixto v. Thomas Tyler
as 8:2024cv00596
Petitioner:
Irving Aguilar-Calixto
Respondent:
Thomas Tyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Casey v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
Sean L. Casey, II
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Igbokwe and Rojas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Estes v. Vaca
as 2:2024cv01312
Plaintiff:
Tyrone B. Estes
Defendant:
Vaca Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
DUNLAP v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 3:2024cv00809
Petitioner:
JERMAINE JOSEPH DUNLAP
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Givens v. Warden at USP Atwater
as 1:2024cv00317
Petitioner:
Gregory Latrell Givens
Respondent:
Warden at USP Atwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Garner v. SVSP Warden et al
as 3:2024cv02751
Plaintiff:
Randall James Garner
Defendant:
SVSP Warden and C/O M. Avila
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Stevenson v. Weichold, et al
as 2:2024cv01315
Plaintiff:
Stevie Stevenson
Defendant:
Lisa Weichold and J. Popovits
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
