Cases 91 - 100 of 12,877
Paris v. Mosley
as 6:2024cv00049
Petitioner:
Lamar Paris
Respondent:
Jamie Mosley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
William Hernandez
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cain v. Marshall et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Captin Thomas Marshall, Jailer Ken Claud, Comprehensive Correctional Care and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00016
Petitioner:
Wesley Harold Simpson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Poling v. USA
as 3:2024cv00227
Petitioner:
Randol Allen Poling, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hargis v. USA
as 5:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
William Ray Hargis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Forte v. North Point Training Center et al
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Montrail Forte
Defendant:
North Point Training Center, The State of Kentucky, Officer Chad Shearer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reid v. Harmon et al
as 1:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Reid
Defendant:
Stephen Harmon, Comprehensive Correctional Care and Nora Janes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacy v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Marvell Jermaine Lacy, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Cook et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Cindy Mitchell
Defendant:
Detective Dylan Cook, Detective Beau Green and Sgt. Matthew Scheer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
